This episode: Will we remember the system of "free trade" behind "globalization" was written by philosopher John Dee in the 1500's for the British Empire? That General Smedley Butler stopped a U.S. Nazi-fascist coup by Prescott Bush and friends in 1933? That 9/11 was an inside job? That we can fight the big corporations poisoning us with fluoride and more here instead of helping them poison other people and steal their stuff overseas? Will truth be the first casualty of remembering war? Again?
CKLN Radios Rude Awakening Morning Show is hosted by Black Krishna, aka BK, aka Vijay Sarma, aka Vij, on Mondays and Thursdays from 6 - 7 am EST on CKLN 88.1 FM, Rogers Cable 947 or CKLN.fm online. Public domain mp3s to share or post clips online on YouTube (etc.) are available after 8 am at Radio4All.net, Archive.org and BlackKrishna.blogspot.com. Please contact blackkrishna@gmail.com or vijay.sarma@gmail.com with your questions, answers, suggestions and more.
Article: Discourse on History, Geography, and Law: John Dee and the Limits of the British Empire, 1576-80.
... Most writers accept that Dee created the phrase "British Empire," but otherwise argue that his imperial vision was simply propaganda and antiquarianism, without much practical value and of limited interest to the English crown and state. ...
... Dee proclaimed the queen's right to trade in new found lands by natural law, and to draw into her dominion those lands that were discovered by English subjects and were not currently in the actual possession of a Christian prince by civil law, canon law, and the law of nations. He laid the foundation for the British claiming territory by occupation rather than mere discovery, recognizing that in civil law possession was not an act of will or intent (as the Spanish tended to see it) but of physical presence and effective control. ...
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-76020627.html
Chatham House History
In 1919 British and American delegates to the Paris Peace Conference, under the leadership of Lionel Curtis, conceived the idea of an Anglo-American Institute of foreign affairs to study international problems with a view to preventing future wars. In the event, the British Institute of International Affairs was founded separately in London in July 1920 and received its Royal Charter in 1926 to become The Royal Institute of International Affairs. The American delegates developed the Council on Foreign Relations in New York as a sister institute. Both are now among the world's leading international affairs think-tanks.
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/about/history/
Stephen Harper faces a sharply divided G20 summit
... âEnlightened sovereignty, in which the temptation to unilateral action in pursuit of transitory gains was tempered by the need to maintain the viability of partner economies, produced win-win situations all over the world.
* "I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism."
* "Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service."
* "War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives."
* "There are 40,000,000 men under arms in the world today, and our statesmen and diplomats have the temerity to say that war is not in the making. Hell's bells! Are these 40,000,000 men being trained to be dancers?"
* "A few profit â and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can't end it by disarmament conferences. You can't eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can't wipe it out by resolutions. It can be smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war."
- Brigadier General Smedley D. Butler, "War Is A Racket" (1935)
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler
John Buchanan on the U.S. Fascist Coup - From Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (2004) by Alex Jones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4-TL5AGHFY
TerrorStorm: A Declassified History of Government Sponsored Terrorism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXgLhkv21Y
Chomsky: No Evidence of al Qaeda Behind 9/11
... Chomsky told Press TV: "The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban... they requested evidence... and the Bush administration refused to provide any. We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any."
"Children under three should never use fluoridated toothpaste," he counseled. "Or drink fluoridated water. And baby formula must never be made up using Toronto tap water. Never."
Why, I wondered? What could have caused such a powerful paradigm shift?
"It's been building up for a couple of years," Limeback told me during a recent telephone interview. "But certainly the crowning blow was the realization that we have been dumping contaminated fluoride into water reservoirs for half a century. The vast majority of all fluoride additives come from Tampa Bay, Florida, smokestack scrubbers. The additives are a toxic byproduct of the super-phosphate fertilizer industry."
"Tragically," he continued, "that means we're not just dumping toxic fluoride into our drinking water. We're also exposing innocent, unsuspecting people to deadly elements of lead, arsenic and radium, all of them carcinogenic. Because of the cumulative properties of toxins, the detrimental effects on human health are catastrophic."
- Dr. Hardy Limeback, Head of Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto, December 5, 1999
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride-expert.htm
NOW AVAILABLE! - THE CASE AGAINST FLUORIDE by Dr. Paul Connett
Interview with Author: Why Water Shouldnât Be Fluoridated - Toronto Globe & Mail, October 18, 2010
In the case of fluoridation, the water supply is being used as a drug-delivery mechanism to treat a medical condition. Why is this wrong, in your view?
It violates peopleâs right to informed consent, which has always been the strongest argument against fluoridation. Weâve never done it with other drugs. Since fluoridation began in 1945, not one other substance has been added to the water to address a health concern. You shouldnât use the water supply to deliver medication, for obvious reasons. You canât control the dose. You canât control who will get it. There is no individual supervision. The whole practice doesnât make sense from a medical point of view.
Alex Jones talks with Paul Connett, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University. Mr. Connett has voiced his concern over the dangers posed by fluoride and the very poor science underpinning its supposed efficacy in protecting children's teeth.
![<?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/rp-navimg.gif)
![Support the <?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/support.png)
