Please note that the Radio4All website will be moving over to new server hardware on August 2nd starting at 10 AM Pacific/1PM Eastern. The work should last two to three hours. During that time, the server will be offline.
Welcome to the new Radio4all website! If you cannot log in, you may need to reset your password. Email here if you need additional support.
Your support is essential if the service is to continue, there are bandwidth bills to pay every month and failing disk drives to replace. Volunteers do the work, but disk drives and bandwidth are not free. We encourage you to contribute financially, even a dollar helps. Click here to donate.Welcome to the new Radio4all website! If you cannot log in, you may need to reset your password. Email here if you need additional support.
Stephen Gowans refers to 2015 ORB International poll. ORB is a research firm that works with US and British governments. This poll shows that President Assad and Iran have a majority support as a positive influence in Syria. Another ORB poll, May 2014, found that the sum of support for the opposition forces, 31%, was less than the total support for Assad and his government showing Assad best represented their interests and aspirations.
The Western Powers cannot allow for Assad to be seen as a credible and legitimate leader. So, the mainstream (and much of the "progressive") media ignore the polls that contradict their attacks against Assad.
Gowans clearly points to the reality: The US foreign policy with respect to the Mid-East must foster divisions and disunity. The last thing they want is a coalescence of some single powerful Arab Union that is strong enough to take control of its resources and markets and destiny.
Suppose a respectable opinion poll found that Bashar al-Assad has more support than the Western-backed opposition. Would that not be major news?